Re: Splitting XSL

> As of today, there'd be one DTD for XSL stylesheets, so we can verify the
> input to an XSL processor




You can't really use DTD for a general XSL can you?
You'd need a different DTD for each result namespace as the elements of
the result tree appear within the templates.
This (extending a given DTD by allowing elements from a second DTD at
the leaves) is supposed to be better handled by the schema proposals,
once they get finalised.

But yes being able to verify that valid input will aways produce valid
output would be nice (but likely to get harder to do as more features
are added to the language)

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list