RE: Venting

At 10:42 AM 2/11/99 +0000, Guy Murphy wrote:
>CSS is easier than FOs, but the equation in one of CSS+HTML, which even at
>a simple level I would suggest is not, and if one where to take exception
>to that I would suggest that expressing pagination in CSS+HTML is not
>simpler. You're arguements don't even begin to address the needs of our
>brothers in print design, they wont be impressed by your suggestion that
>they should use CSS+HTML.

What is this 'equation is one of CSS+HTML'?  You don't need to use HTML
with CSS - you can use it directly with XML, as is done in IE5 and
Netscape's Gecko.  See the CSS2 spec for info on using CSS with XML, or the
MS/NS docs for their browser pre-releases.


Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list