[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: About Microsoft Patent
Didier PH Martin wrote: > > Yep, this has, for sure implications to XSL with FO not as XSL as a > transformation language which is not covered by the patent. I guess this add > more weight to the actual thread about splitting XSL from the formatting > object stuff. I refuse to get my nighty in a knot about an unsupportable patent. Just because the monkeys in the patent office will approve anything doesn't mean that a judge will back them. Microsoft would also look pretty silly defending such a stupid pattent -- and losing. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did, but she did it backwards and in high heels." --Faith Whittlesey XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|