[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: inconsistencies between XSL and XLL
Hi Chris, <you said> It may be useful to read the XLink design principles [3]. In general though, having just gone looking for references to back up what I already understand, I agree that, without already knowing the answer, it is difficult to find it ;-) <Reply> You are right, now that I get the point you mentionned in mind, I catch different things that I couln't at reading the specs without that context. Maybe, it would be useful to briefly state this context so that we know that PIs are not considered content and therefore not part of the name space. Otherwise, we would make the inference that PIs would be part of the xml name space not because of content/noncontent reasons but ownership reasons a part-of relationship instead of a is-a-content-of relationship). So just to expose explicitely the underlying model. This would prevent some confusion. Thanx for your helpful comments Chris. Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|