[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL with scripting
Hi. Could you expand a little on what contradiction you find? Some of my views on certain issues have changed as the result of counter arguement on this list, so I am genuinely interested if you feel you see an inconsistency. I thought I was addressing two seperate end of the debate with regard to concern, maybe my expression was sloppy. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/23/98 04:33:31 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: XSL with scripting I believe that these paragraphs contradict each other: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi. > > If ECMAScript where included in the XSL spec there would be no need for you [SNIP] ... > And if your concern is the adultaration of a simple declaritive style [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|