[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Stepping back, part two...

Subject: Re: Stepping back, part two...
From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 16:40:33 -0500 (EST)
guy pawson
[Guy Murphy]
> Giving voice to an admittedly childish, emotive response (that I
> would never be so rude as to predujice somebody actively with), I
> feel XSL is geting bent out of shape in order to appease those
> wishing it to facilitate print. The childish repsonse to this is
> "You've got you're tools, now let me get mine". Print has SGML and
> DSSSL, and I sort of see XML and XSL as the Web equivelant.  I think
> somehow, as a Web designer I feel that my tools are being hijacked
> by print considerations.

My childish response to this is a big fat raspberry.

Print considerations *started* the XSL effort; attempts to limit its
scope to HTML transformation are closer to hijacking than are attempts
to keep to its original mission.

And the print world *doesn't* have DSSSL, at least not in practice.
The main problem with DSSSL is that it requires, in some places, a
"tight coupling" between the processor reading the stylesheet and the
processor actually producing formatted output.  Some things in the
former require knowledge of what's going on in the latter.  As a
result, there are no implementations that I know of that implement
these complex objects.  At best, "intelligent" flow objects can be
created and passed downstream, as Jade does with the RTF and TeX
back-ends.  One goal of the XSL effort is to make implementation
possible without that tight coupling, by giving the formatting objects
themselves a higher degree of intelligence, or the ability to express
their own formatting constraints to the formatter without
communication back to the stylesheet processor.

And once again, you've fallen prey to the false dichotomy between Web
and print.  Just because the *current* state is that Web formatting
[expletive deleted] doesn't mean that good formatting should be the exclusive
province of dead-tree output.  Instead, push vendors and developers to
bring you to the point where you can have "print" formatting on your
screen, and sensitive to the environment you've established (unlike
PDF).

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.