[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: FW: XSL - Loss to braille style sheets?

Subject: RE: FW: XSL - Loss to braille style sheets?
From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 07:52:43 +0100
braille xsl
> > Another reason to ensure some form of procedural language
DP: My error - I'm never as accurate as James :-)
Perhaps programming language is 'better'. 
[Scheme would do me]
> > is kept - Internationalisation this time, rather than the braille
> > using minority, or don't they count either.
> > 
> > No Paul, I don't want to have to wait two years.
> 
> Nobody said you should wait two or three years. I said that between now
> and two or three years from now, you should (perhaps) do your ad hoc
> manipulations either on the INPUT to XSL 
> 
Possible, as JC suggests using DOM access is viable.
Why not from within the style sheet? I haven't heard any valid reasons not
to.

> or the OUTPUT of XSL 
No Paul. Contractions need to be applied prior to formatting.
Having laid out a paragraph on a page, there seems little point in
contracting (to half the length) then having to format _again_

> instead of
> *IN* XSL. But I'm not trying to stop you from doing them. The standards to
> allow you to manipulate the input and output of XSL are 95% in place:
> ECMAScript and the DOM.
> 
Yes, we could apply prior to using a stylesheet. 
Yes, Ecmascript and accessing the source grove via the DOM is viable.
We then have to ask MS/Netscape etc, to 'fit' the pre-process into their
model of operation. 


          N O.


> BTW, if you get conversion to braille working as an XSL post-process,
which it won't.

>  then
> you can plug your post-process onto the back of any XSL spec and open up
> the web to Braille.
Our objective.
>  On the other hand, if you embed it in particular
> stylesheets, then only a small fraction of the web will be available in
> Braille.
> 
Illogical. In the same way that you couldn't write a stylesheet to present
any
web XML document to your tastes.

> Everything I touch turns into Python.
Python would do the job, but v slowly ;-)

Last post, I promise. 
I'll use W3C channels in future.

Sorry to be a bore to you sighted guys.

Regards, DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.