[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSL Working draft question

Subject: Re: XSL Working draft question
From: Ray Cromwell <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 11:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
xsl boolean expression
> Square brackets do selection. An expression of the form e[b] evaluates
> b returning a result X and for each node in X evaluates b; it returns
> the set of nodes from X for which b evaluates to true. b is a boolean
> expression which is an expression that takes an input set of nodes and
> returns true or false.  Any query can be used as a boolean expression
> and will evaluate to true if it returns an empty node set.

  How does the current XSL child qualifiers fit with this though?
book[excerpt] seems wrong to me. It should be book[has-child(excerpt)]

Is XSL going to support boolean logic?

book[has-child(excerpt) && attribute(child(excerpt), "foo") = "bar"] ?

(book nodes that have a child named 'excerpt' which has a foo
attribute with the value bar?)

It seems to me like this is the wrong way to go about things. Either
XSL patterns should be equivalent to regular expressions on a tree
(i.e. one can view chapter/section/title  as "match a chapter token,
followed by a section token, followed by a title token), and indeed,
it is very efficient to compile a whole bunch of patterns into
a finite automaton. Or, XSL patterns are basically assertions in
a scripting language about DOM properties.

In the second case, why invent a new language? Why not simply use a 
subset of ECMAScript with some kind of DOM-hash convention.

The problem I have with the idea of a qualifier being an arbitrary
boolean expression is that it prevents optimizations. With the
regular expression approach, I can compile a whole bunch of XSL
rules into an efficient data structure and "match all simultaneously"

But with the boolean expression approach, I end up having to actually
evaluate an expression for each rule. Worse, I have to write a 
parser and evaluator for a totally new language. 

I guess the main question that keeps popping up for me is, what's
wrong with CSS-style selectors? What kinds of queries is XSL going
to allow that are really useful that I can get already with CSS?

If there is a query that a CSS style selector can't do, then XSL
should simply allow the user to use ECMAScript as a hook to feed
XML nodes into the back end formatter. XSL's pattern matching
should handle the 90% most common queries, and leave the other
10% for a low-level mechanism or extensible hook.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.