[no subject]

I've already expressed my desire for a separate tree addressing language
usable by both XSL and XLink.

It occurs to me that maybe the formatting objects could be separate too.

I would actually like XSL to consist of three *separate* things:

1. Pattern Language for Tree Addressing
2. DTD and Specification of Formatting Objects
3. Specification for Stylesheets themselves, Tree Transforms, etc.

2 and 3 already use separate namespaces.

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx      http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network             ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School                  ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia                ( http://www.schema.net/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list