Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can't we have both ?

James K. Tauber wrote:
> 
> My feeling on the issue is that a spec be developed for tree addressing
> patterns that serves the needs of both XPointers and XSL patterns. Such a
> spec could stand apart (but be normative to) both XLink and XSL.

I agree completely.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"You have the wrong number."
"Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?"
"No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the 
taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The 
show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man"


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list