I had no idea there was this level of Saxon integration in Python. I will
check it out.

Definitely better than calling Saxon Java as a command execution.

Cheers,

E.

_____________________________________________
Eliot Kimber
Sr Staff Content Engineer
O: 512 554 9368
M: 512 554 9368
servicenow.com<https://www.servicenow.com>
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/servicenow> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/servicenow> |
YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/servicenowinc> |
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/servicenow>

From: Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, May 26, 2023 at 5:06 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re:  Re: creating multiple xml documents from one large xml
document
[External Email]

________________________________


On 5/26/2023 11:55 PM, Eliot Kimber
eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Or you could call Saxon from a Python program as a command-line call then
consume the result using lxml and continue on your Pythonic way.



With Python, consider to use SaxonC instead of calling Saxon as a command
line: https://pypi.org/project/saxonche/<https://pypi.org/project/saxonche/>
XSL-List info and archive<http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/3453418> (by
email<>)