Hi Wendell,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 7:09b/PM Piez, Wendell A. (Fed)
wendell.piez@xxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The essential difference is that you were not allowed in *unextended* XSLT
> 1.0 to treat the fragment like a tree. In 2.0 you were invited to do so.
>
I think, its certainly more useful as an XSLT language, to treat the
fragment like a tree by default (as you rightly wrote). This helps us
solve, more kinds of XML transformation use cases, with the standard XSLT
language (2.0 and 3.0).
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
|
Cart
