Hello Mukul,
I always kept a link to your page regarding static XSLT quality tool, and
moved some of the rules into my own Schematron ruleset. As OxygenXML now also
has some quality rules implemented I think it is worth exploring this path.
E.g. with XSLT packages it becomes even more important to follow some coding
rules.
Regarding a lot of the other content, there is way too much XSLT 1 stuff in
there. Just during the last two or three weeks I was coaching a new colleague
into XSLT, and only when we were leaving the simple element/attribute name
changes behind us and started using xsl:function and took advantage of clever
XPath features, he started to accept XSLT as a "proper" programming language.
Having said that, I would suggest to remove all of that ancient stuff and then
have a look at the rest.
In general, I think there are some new XSLT 3 concepts that deserve some
tutorials.
Thanks a lot for your contributions,
- Michael
> Am 02.07.2017 um 09:42 schrieb Mukul Gandhi gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
> There was a time, when I was heavily involved with XSLT.
>
> I had created this web site related to XSLT,
http://gandhimukul.tripod.com/xslt/index.html
>
> This hasn't been updated in a while.
>
> Looking at this site, can anyone suggest if this site is still valuable? I
can start adding information to this, containing information related to XSLT
3.0 since its now a W3C REC.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
|