On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:45:21AM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev scripsit:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Personally I'm happy to go to three or four lines for an XPath expression, but beyond that I start to feel uncomfortable with it; can't really explain why.
> 
> In my Balisage-2013 article "Programming in XPath 3.0" [1],  I raised
> the need for an XPath "import clause". 

Such a thing would be lovely.

While we're extending XPath, can we have support for named, referenceable
predicate definitions?  Preferably composable ones, so I can combine a
group of named predicates under another name?

-- Graydon, who is going to be embarrassed if that's snuck into 3.0