On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:06:58 +0000
Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > 
> > It's an error Mike. Surely to goodness you can fix that as
> > editorial? Liam, is it too late?
> > 
> 
> The WGs voted in their meeting in Prague to publish the PR documents
> as Recommendations subject to fixing of a handful of known errors.
> Editors have authority to fix things that are purely typographical,
> e.g. a broken link or a spelling mistake, but this is a technical
> correction so fixing it needs WG endorsement.

Is it? "Section J.4.1, Substantive Changes, [1] says function
annotations were all removed, as does the bug [2] to which the appendix
refers. " 

I'd say that was editorial insofar as the editor failed to carry out
that action?

regards


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk