On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:41:13 +0100
"Abel Braaksma (Exselt)" <abel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 30-3-2014 0:39, Philipp Kursawe wrote:
> > That's unbelievable that MS hasn't picked up on XSLT 2.0 yet.
> 
> Indeed, and they have meanwhile said, in several blog posts and
> interviews, that they do not have plans to change that, they will
> stick to XSLT 1.0 for the foreseeable future.

"A common tale but true"? I simply cannot follow the (il)logic of this,
other than laziness. Why do organisations (users I'm talking about not
providers) stick like glue to 1.0?

Has anyone seen a rational explanation? 



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk