Subject: Re: XTTE1100: A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the @group-adjacent attribute
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:48:48 -0700
|
It seems to me that something like this might be useful:
group-adjacent="my:deepEqualAdjacent(*)"
of course this only conveys the idea -- it is obvious that this isn't precise.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:08 PM, G. Ken Holman
<gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 2013-05-12 20:00 -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>>
>> select="*" group-adjacent="string-join(descendent::*/local-name(),'
>> ')"
>>
>> this treats the following two fragments as belonging to the same
>> group, and I believe Ihe doesn't want this:
>>
>> <B>
>> <C/>
>> <D/>
>> </B>
>>
>> and
>>
>> <B>
>> <C>
>> <D>
>> </C>
>> </B>
>
>
> Well spotted, Dmitre.
>
> How about something like the following to make the distinction, using a
> simple non-name character to attach the depth to the name?
>
> group-adjacent="string-join(descendent::*/
> concat(local-name(),'$',count(ancestor::*)))"
>
> (untested)
>
>
> . . . . . . . . Ken
>
> --
> Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
> Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
> Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
> G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
> Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
>
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
|