Re: [xsl] [XPath 3.0] Why should I bother specifying the "a

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: [XPath 3.0] Why should I bother specifying the "arity" of a function that I invoke?
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:26:06 +0000

On 31/10/2012 22:09, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

concat#3 is an expression that returns a function item.
So is concat#3 equivalent to this partial function application:

concat(?, ?, ?)

If yes, when is one preferred over the other?

With a zero-arity function partial function application isn't available. In all other cases they're equivalent.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread
[XPath 3.0] Why should I bother specifying the "arity" of a function that I invoke? Costello, Roger L. - 31 Oct 2012 21:06:20 -0000 Liam R E Quin - 31 Oct 2012 21:33:10 -0000 Michael Kay - 31 Oct 2012 21:54:24 -0000 Costello, Roger L. - 31 Oct 2012 22:09:59 -0000 Michael Kay - 31 Oct 2012 23:26:19 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Oct 2012 21:55:07 -0000 sean - 1 Nov 2012 01:32:41 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Costello, Roger L.	Thread	Re: [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Dimitre Novatchev
RE: [XPath 3.0] Why should I , Costello, Roger L.	Date	[XSLT 3.0], sean
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >