Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:15:08 +0200

On 03/09/2012 17:12, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

However, the element that I just inlined may have a reference. So I
store the results into a variable and then repeat the process on the
content of the variable.

Why?

Why copy the whole thing rather than just apply templates and follow references as you go?

I don't see why you need any local storage or variables at all.
--

David

google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread

Re: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L.	Thread	RE: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L.
RE: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L.	Date	Re: Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Graydon
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >