Wendell Piez wrote:

  Hi,

> "XSL", in fact, properly means the combination
of XSLT and
> XSL-FO, even if it's also commonly used to mean XSLT without
>
XSL-FO.

  Even worse...  Some people use it to refer to XSLT (like an
"abbreviation" of XSLT, mainly because of the usual extension
.xsl I guess).
 Some people use it to refer to XSL-FO, as the XSL
spec actually refers to the
XSLT spec, but includes (and is) the
spec body for XSL-FO.  And I guess some
people use it to refer to
XSL, but I rarely have the opportunity to speak
about XSL as a
whole ;-)

  My rule of thumb: always use either XSLT or
XSL-FO, and if you
hear XSL, ask for precision.

  Regards,


-- 
Florent
Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/