Re: HST's answers Re: Efficient way to check se
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As David Carlisle pointed out, '=' already supplies that > functionality. I think the XPath 2.0 operator '=' (one of the general comparison operators) atomizes the operands so I think it won't check equality based on node identity. It seems the following expression can do checks based on node identity (I inferred this meaning from Dave's requirement... the "member()" function), some $x in $seq satisfies ($x is $item) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format