Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:20:57 +0000

On 08/11/2010 19:13, Andriy Gerasika wrote:

good practice.

why is -9 good practice rather that -188 or -123.456, or, as in the posted code, -0.5 ? what is so special about -9 that you say it _should_ be used?

>
> Saxon will say Recoverable Error if two template match the same node.

But there was no other templates of the same priority in the supplied code.

David

Current Thread

[XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
- Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt - 8 Nov 2010 18:23:00 -0000
  - Andriy Gerasika - 8 Nov 2010 18:54:52 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 8 Nov 2010 18:57:02 -0000
      - Andriy Gerasika - 8 Nov 2010 19:13:41 -0000
      - David Carlisle - 8 Nov 2010 21:21:15 -0000 <=
      - Andriy Gerasika - 8 Nov 2010 22:16:46 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 8 Nov 2010 18:56:01 -0000
    - Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt - 8 Nov 2010 19:15:41 -0000
      - Message not available
      - G. Ken Holman - 8 Nov 2010 19:29:05 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika	Thread	Re: [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika
Re: [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra	Date	Re: [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >