Subject: Re: Converting from <dt><dd> pairs to better XML
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:13:51 +0100
|
This is based on the assumption that each dt is followed by exactly
one dd. If there may be multiple dds after each dt, you should group
adjacent dds in a first pass.
I would normally tackle this using group-starting-with="dt", creating a
group consisting of a dt and its following dd's.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|
| Re: Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
|
Thread |
Re: Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
|
| Re: Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
|
Date |
Re: Converting from <dt><dd> , Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
|
|
Month |
|
|
Cart
