Re: generic grouping without nesting for-each-group?
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:29, Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> wrote: > It has become rather complicated with two functions due to the requirement > to add missing levels. It hadn't actually occurred to me to do the recursion in a function rather than a named template. Fun! > Your latest suggestion to first normalize the input by adding missing levels > and then to group in a second pass might indeed be an approach leading to > shorter and less complicated code. So far not thought of a better suggestion... though I have a natural suspicion of adding in phantom structure in any case. -James
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format