[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?

Subject: Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?
From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 19:02:03 -0400
 Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?
Hi Folks,

1. Everything that can be done using xsl:for-each can be done using a
recursive function. (True or False)

2. There are things that can be done using a recursive function that cannot be
done using xsl:for-each. (True or False)

3. xsl:for-each is syntactic sugar. (True or False)

4. Favor recursive functions over xsl:for-each. (True or False)

/Roger

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.