Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNam

Play the video

Subject: Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames
From: ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:25:07 -0500

Hi,

Complaining may not be so constructive but it may seem that expressing opinions and viewpoints with logic, experience, and clear sight may be. The objective should not be determining who is right but rather what is best for most in the long term.

And we may be going off topic.

Cheers,
ac

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:19 +1030, Justin Johansson wrote:
He's mainly on about the conundrum surrounding XML 5th edition to which
my thoughts were:
"As an implementor, this Qname change presents for me yet another hurdle.
It doesn't change it a whole lot from XML 1.1.  You were supporting
XML 1.1, right?  If no, what hope would there have been that you'd
have supported an XML 1.2? Even less. If yes, quit complaining :-)
Liam

Current Thread

Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: are all strings in a sequ, Liam R E Quin	Thread	Re: are all strings in a sequ, Liam R E Quin
Re: are all strings in a sequ, Liam R E Quin	Date	Re: are all strings in a sequ, Liam R E Quin
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >