Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNam

Play the video

Subject: Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:57:53 +0000

On 03/02/2010 11:21, David Carlisle wrote:

'^(\i([\c-[:]])*:)?\i([\c-[:]])*$'

David

Although one should probably note that because of the W3C's rather cavalier attitude to maintaining standards, the question in the subject line is not well posed: The set of legal Qnames changed between XML 1.0 edition 4 and edition 5, so the meaning of \c which is defined by reference to the XML spec depends on which edition 1.0 of XML is being implemented

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread

Re: are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: are all strings in a sequ, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: are all strings in a sequ, Justin Johansson
Re: are all strings in a sequ, David Carlisle	Date	Re: are all strings in a sequ, Justin Johansson
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >