[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

Subject: Re: Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:20:05 +0100
Re:  Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?
Hi Michael,

So there is (quite) some development then. Intriguing that parties decide to create XSLT 2.0 processors as part of larger products, instead of developing it as stand-alone products. When few parties take on the development of a new standard, it is easy to jump to conclusions about its life expectancy. This sure sounds that XSLT 2.0 still is alive and kicking!

Regards,
Abel Braaksma

Michael Kay wrote:
Saxon and Altova are still around. Altova when I last looked had fixed most
of the conformance bugs that were present in early releases. Some users now
seem to develop on Altova and then deploy on Saxon.

Gestalt is still there, but with no further development.

Oracle and Microsoft have made no further moves, as far as one can see.

IBM have announced their XSLT 2.0 processor, available as part of Websphere.

Intel have announced their XSLT 2.0 processor, available as part of SOA
Expressway.

I have heard rumours of two or three other processors that are under
development, but I have no idea when (if ever) they will see the light of
day.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay




-----Original Message-----
From: Abel Braaksma [mailto:abel.online@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 11 January 2010 18:58
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?


Happy New Year to everybody!

While slowly getting my hands back into XSLT 2.0 again, I was wondering whether the past one and a half years (yes, I admit, I was a bit "out") any new XSLT 2.0 processor or plan thereof has seen the light. Here's what my memory gives and what I deducted from my copy of the xsl-list:

-- Gestalt, Eiffel XSLT 2.0 processor far in progress, but ceased further development in Nov. 2008, open source
-- Saxon, Java XSLT 2.0 SA and Basic, fully functional, both commercial and open source editions
-- Altova, XSLT 2.0 command line only (aka AltovaXML), fully functional, known bugs, closed source, free
-- Oracle 10g XSLT 2.0 processor, closed source, free separate download, unclear development status, pre-Rec
-- Microsoft had plans for XSLT 2.0 for .NET 3.5, but no real new news seen since, not included in .NET 4.0
-- XSLT 2.0 features implemented with XSLT 1.0: remember the plan, can't seem to find it, it would be limited though


That is: 4 processors actually developed, some half-baked plans, one (two if we count SA + B double) real XSLT 2.0 processor, one XSLT 2.0 commercial processor (AltovaXML) with a disputed reputation and reliability. Is that the current status still? Does anybody know of another commercial or open implementation that's missing from this list?

I'm particularly surprised about MS, esp. now that more and more of their new technology is based on XSLT and XML. Internally, they've implemented the XPath 2.0 datamodel, but that's all so far it seems.

Kind regards to everyone,

Abel

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.