Subject: RE: xsl:output and xsl:result-document
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:46:03 +0100
|
> Thanks Martin and Andrew - these are both helpful
> suggestions. As it turned out in my case, I was able to
> output text while declaring it to be xml: I didn't think this
> would work, but apparently at least Saxon will allow you to
> output an xml document that contains only text: no elements,
> which is just what I needed.
If you use disable-output-escaping="yes" and omit-xml-declaration="yes" (and
don't output any elements) then yes, the XML output method becomes very
close to the text output method. But it seems clearer to use method="text",
and there is nothing that stops you using different output methods for
different result documents. And relying on disable-output-escaping seems
very error prone - the first time you encounter data containing "<" or "&",
you're going to find that you forgot to put d-o-e on the relevant
xsl:value-of instruction.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
|