|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: returning nodes which have a specific child
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael Sokolov<sokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > including the > bizarre conceit that attribute *nodes* are not matched by the 'node()' test > (perhaps some other name would have been more appropriate?). I am not aware of the discussions, that went amongst the WG members, when XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 was designed. But I think, Calling attributes as "nodes" is ok. As attributes are modeled similar to other kinds of nodes. They have name, value, parent etc. Attributes can be referred as @* while other kinds of nodes with node() and so on. I find this design ok :) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






