Subject: Re: counter vs. functional counterpart
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:04:11 -0700
|
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Jeff
Shelley<jshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello.
> B Does anybody know what xsl file can take this:
>
> <rows>
> B <row>
> B B B <name>John</name>
> B B B <otherName/>
> B </row>
> B <row>
> B B B <name>Paul</name>
> B B B <otherName/>
> B </row>
> B <row>
> B B B <name>Ringo</name>
> B B B <nickName>ClassCastException</nickName>
> B </row>
> B <row>
> B B B <name>George</name>
> B B B <otherName/>
> B </row>
> </rows>
>
>
> and turn it into this?
>
> B B B B 1-John
> B B B B 2-Paul
> B B B B 3-Ringo
> B B B B 4-ClassCastException
> B B B B 5-George
This problem is so simple, that it doesn't ever need <xsl:number/>:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:for-each select=
"*/*/*[self::name or self::nickName]">
<xsl:value-of select=
"concat('
', position(), '-', .)"/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
|