RE: for-each over sequences of sequences
> I've found a workaround for this issue by wrapping the > current-group() in a <group/>-element, but I was wondering if > someone can provide a more straight-forward solution. That's the correct workaround. One of the reasons that XDM doesn't offer "sequences of sequences" in its repertoire of data types is that it was felt that in an XML-based environment, the right way to represent a tree structure was using XML elements. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format