|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: AltovaXML bugs? (and other engines)
Hi,
I will report this to Altova tomorrow via their ticket system. They are continually updating xmlspy, but I have not seen a running list. I would be interested in seeing dif list also. xmlspy is a great editor and has a decent xslt processor. Saxon, by far is the best. It's fast and reliable. Saxonica (Michael Kay) is very good at providing the very best xslt 2.0 processor. Phil On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Scott Trenda wrote: In response to this... we're using AltovaXML at my work, since its license is very business-friendly and it doesn't require a managed- code base (Java or .NET) to run. However, I've noticed that when compared to Saxon, it gives different output in some places, and for the few times I've looked into it, the error is within AltovaXML. (Not to mention it's slow compared to Saxon.)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






