Subject: RE: most efficient escape quotes?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:51:18 -0000
|
I would have though it was more intuitive to use replace(), and I would
expect it's also more efficient, but there's no way of knowing without
measuring it.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Koberg [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 February 2009 16:43
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: most efficient escape quotes?
>
> Hi,
>
> With XSL 1.0 and XPath 1.0 I had used recursion to escape quotes.
> Using XPath 2.0, is the most efficient 'escape quotes' (\") the
> following:
>
> <xsl:sequence select="string-join(tokenize(., '"'), '\"')"/>
>
> Is there a more efficient (fastest, least memory) way?
>
> thanks,
> -Rob
|
Cart
