RE: XSLT 2.1

Play the video

Subject: RE: XSLT 2.1
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:38:58 -0000

> That is, what I propose could have been done, but it would be 
> a too clumsy road to follow?

I don't think it could have been specified in a way that would pass the
technical scrutiny that is applied to W3C specifications.

(This is not uncommon. Saxon-SA for example implements a try/catch
mechanism. It is much easier to implement this in code than to specify its
behaviour with the level of precision needed to get through the W3C
process.)

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

Re: XSLT 2.1, (continued)
- Darcy Parker - 31 Oct 2008 14:36:16 -0000
- Michael Kay - 31 Oct 2008 16:58:39 -0000
  - Jesper Tverskov - 31 Oct 2008 17:22:21 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 31 Oct 2008 17:39:23 -0000 <=
    - Message not available
    - Wendell Piez - 31 Oct 2008 18:45:24 -0000
    - Message not available
    - James Fuller - 31 Oct 2008 18:49:24 -0000
    - Message not available
    - Scott Trenda - 31 Oct 2008 20:12:50 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT 2.1, Jesper Tverskov	Thread	Re: XSLT 2.1, Wendell Piez
Re: XPath "//", speed, and Sa, Wendell Piez	Date	Re: XSLT 2.1, Wendell Piez
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >