Re: XSLT 2.0 processor signalling error, for type erro
Hi Mike, Thanks for your reply to my questions. I have some more questions, please ... On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > most processors actually compile down to some intermediate > representation which is then interpreted by some kind of virtual machine: In case of Saxon, would you say that there is some intermediate representation? I think, the user (or, programmer) has the view that he/she is just running a XSLT program in one pass. > XSLT is essentially dynamically-typed (meaning type-checking isn't done until > runtime) except that there's provision for optional optimistic static typing > - which means you can report a compile-time error In case of XSLT, how do we differentiate between compile time and runtime? I might guess, that prior to creation of the result XDM tree it's compilation. Does XSLT 2.0 spec define compilation and runtime phases for XSLT? -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format