Subject: Re: xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem
From: mark bordelon <markcbordelon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
|
I did understand you mean the first node, not the first attribute.
Comprehension check: Does this at all contradict what Darcy wrote? I don't think it does...but just making sure.
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 11:17 AM
I wrote:
> //A[contains((B/@a[1]), 'foo')]
but meant:
//A[contains((B/@a)[1], 'foo')]
...but hopefully you got the idea!
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
|
Cart
