Subject: RE: Result tree fragment to string?
From: "Garriss Jr., James P." <jgarriss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:31:13 -0400
|
> From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> In other words, you need to modify the RTF but you are forbidden to
> modify the code that generates it? :-)
Exactly!
And there is good reason for this: separation of concerns. One team
generates the RTF (code which is extensive and complex); another team
modifies the result to meet a specific need.
> For this, you really have no choice but use XSLT 2.0, a node-set()
> extension in 1.0, or output the RTF (along with whatever else you
> need) as an intermediate result to be processed in a discrete step.
That's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure I hadn't missed
anything.
> Or is it possible simply to override the logic that generates it with
> your own, or bypass it entirely?
Regrettably, no.
Thanks much for thinking through this with me!
James Garriss
http://garriss.blogspot.com
|