RE: checking sequence inside processing-instruction
> > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('page')"> > > I first thought that was a mistake. I always used the form > processing-instruction(page) instead (well, the rare times I > used it). > But I checked in the REC and saw that both forms are allowed. > Is there any particular reason behind that choice? XPath 1.0 required the quotes. XPath 2.0 allowed the unquoted name for consistency with the new syntax element(e) and attribute(a); it was felt that the quotes were a bad idea because they suggested to users that an arbitrary expression could be used here, rather than a constant name. I used the quotes because I didn't know whether the OP was using 1.0 or 2.0. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format