[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:40:53 -0700
Re:  LINQ to XML versus XSLT
> Not clear how you are using URI #fragments, but be aware that the user agent does not send those to the server.  So your XSLT that is responding to the request will never see them.

Yes, in this case it's a server side XSLT talking to itself, for all
intents and purposes.  When dealing with many XSLT templates running in
an environment where we want to cache things, one thing we have tried is
using a combination of fn:doc-available/fn:doc and xsl:result-document
to load/store cached representations of the final output (there's a need
to be very careful about the order of evaluation of course), but what it
amounts to is checking the cache for a valid response and then building
and storing the response if there wasn't a cached version available.


Jim

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
James A. Robinson                       jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanford University HighWire Press      http://highwire.stanford.edu/
+1 650 7237294 (Work)                   +1 650 7259335 (Fax)

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.