RE: the future of xslt
> IMO, it doesn't (quite) matter if the current discussion > doesn't lead to running software, much as I would prefer it > if it did. The question of whether there would be a libxslt > for XSLT 2.0 has been asked several times over recent years, > and each time it comes closer to being answered with "yes". To take the discussion in a slightly different direction, there's absolutely no doubt that there is a demand for XSLT 2.0 especially if it's free. What is also clear is that not many people are going to develop free XSLT 2.0 processors for the fun or kudos of it. Amateurs are asking serious questions about whether they can commit the time, and corporations are asking serious questions about the business case for developing free software. To be honest, I can't think of many areas where there are multiple open-source products implementing the same specification. It's rather odd that we should even imagine that this should be a normal state of affairs. If we need XSLT 2.0 processors that cover gaps in the market, then we may have to be prepared to pay for them. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format