>> aren't FO specific questions like asking XHTML specific
>> questions
>
>  Actually XSL-FO is on topic by definition of XSL List:
>
>    http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/
>
>    There is no restriction to what may be posted on the
>    XSL-List provided it is related to XSL, which is
>    considered to include XSLT (versions 1 and 2), XPath
>    (versions 1 and 2) and XSL Formatting Objects (FO).


Sure, but really, what does FO have to do with XSLT - other than
distant history and similarities in the name?

You could argue that XML Schema has a lot more to do with 2.0, so
maybe that could be added to the definition...

(just making observations, there are only a handful of FO posts each
year anyway)


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/