|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
I stumbled upon these two statements, both by Colin Paul Adams.
As for Gestalt versus xsltproc [...] Xsltproc will run faster,
but is non-compliant to the XSLT 1.0 recommendation.
-- http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/200701/post40510.html[...] when I still used XSLT [1.0, M. L.], I would use xsltproc for my processor, due to its famed speed (I wasn't aware of its non-compliance at the time) [...] -- http://colina.demon.co.uk/?q=node/20 What exactly does xsltproc's (that is: LibXSLT's) non-compliance (with the spec, I guess) consist in? And is there a standard test suite of XSLT programs to determine a processor's compliance? The other day I noticed that for a particular case, xsltproc produces a different result than its fellow processors. Has this difference been determined in more general terms? http://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/archives/200804/msg00241.html Michael Ludwig
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|







