[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Use of data() function

Subject: Re: Use of data() function
From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:49:54 +0100
Re:  Use of data() function
sorry, I was confused by what you were saying earlier, and thought
surely he can't be saying THAT! basically from coming in in the middle
of the thread, reading something that made me think: by god, the good
Doctor has been possessed of the Devil!

I suppose I should have thought it through first, but I was on my
fifth cup of coffee, and suffering from a bad day of debugging code
that worked the day before.

Bryan Rasmussen

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not sure what point you're making
>  >
>  > sure but it also makes sense to say child::sub
>  of course, and you can.
> >
>  > I don't think most doc-heads would accept as valid the idea
>  > that a mixed content element (especially if the element has
>  > the mixed content in it) is of type string.
>  >
>  of course, and it isn't of type string. But if you atomize it you get an
>  untypedAtomic value which can be used anywhere you might use a string.
>  Michael Kay
>  http://www.saxonica.

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.