|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Use of data() function (was: Re: [OT])
> I'm not sure this is a great example - if it can be made more > real world let me know and I'll add it to http://schema-aware.com As I said, I don't think you need data() very often because atomization nearly always happens automatically when you need it. Testing a boolean-valued attribute like if(@married) is a case where it's very easy to fall into the trap of assuming that atomization will happen when it doesn't. It's probably especially dangerous when using variables: <xsl:function name="f"> <xsl:param name="isMarried"/> <xsl:if test="$isMarried">... f(@married) Another good reason for declaring parameter types: if the param is declared with as="xs:boolean" then the attribute node will be atomized as part of the function call. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

![RE: Use of data() function (was: Re: [OT])](/images/get_stylus.gif)





