Jesper Tverskov wrote:

  Hi

> Is there any way in pure XSLT 2.0 that we can make our own
> function similar to saxon:try() only available for the SA
> version of Saxon.

  Unfortunately not.  Exception handling is really something
that lacks in XSLT.  I would really like if that was
standardized.  I have some ideas on that subject there:

    http://www.fgeorges.org/xslt/error-safe/error-safe.html

> I want to do many transformations from inside the
> stylesheet, and if a transformation fails I want the
> stylesheet to continue with the next transformation.

  I implemented those ideas there:

    http://www.fgeorges.org/xslt/error-safe/

  But this is far from production-quality.  This is very
experimental.  But as first glance, as this is to catch
errors from saxon:transform(), that could helps (the
complexity is caused by rewritings, and I guess expressions
using saxon:transform() or very unlikely to be rewritten).

  And that was not adapted to Saxon 9.

  Regards,

--drkm

























      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr