[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: unfolding compressed equivalents

Subject: Re: unfolding compressed equivalents
From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:17:49 -0500
Re:  unfolding compressed equivalents
Hi,

You have laid out the problem well. But, you should probably follow up
with some of the problematic XSL you have tried.

best,
-Rob


On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:25 +0100, Marie Bilde Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have been struggling with a tricky transformation-problem. Maybe
> somebody can help me come up with a good xslt-solution.
> 
> THE BACKGROUND:
> In dictionary entries, text is very often compressed in order to save
> space/paper. But these entries can be very hard to read. When
> publishing a bilingual dictionary online, I would like to unfold each
> equivalent to all of the equivalents, that are postulated to exist in
> it's originally compressed structure.
> 
> AN EXAMPLE:
> In a Danish-English dictionary, I have this extremely compressed
> English equivalent(s):
> "[last] Sunday (or Monday or Tuesday) evening (or night) I was at home"
> 
> - The use of [square brackets] indicate, that the content can be omitted.
> - Alternatives to a word - or to a sequence of words - are shown in
> one (parenthesis), separated by the word "or".
> - Brackets, parenthesis and or's are of course just presentational.
> 
> The data are represented in xml like this:
> <equivalent>
>     <omittable>last</omittable>
>     { }
>     <either>Sunday</either>
>     <or>Monday</or>
>     <or>Tuesday</or>
>     { }
>     <either>evening</either>
>     <or>night</or>
>     { I was at home}
> </equivalent>
> 
>  I have shown the text content on the top level in {curly braces}
> 
> The rules about equivalents are (here simplified for the example):
> - An either-element must be immediately followed by at least one or-element
> - There can be zero, one or several omittable-elements in an equivalent
> - There can be zero, one or several either/or-constructions in an equivalent
> - The equivalents have mixed content
> 
> The xml-schema fragment describing such a compressable equivalent is as follows:
> <xs:element name="equivalent">
>     <xs:complexType mixed ="true">
>         <xs:choice minOccurs="0" macOccurs="unbounded">
>             <xs:sequence>
>                 <xs:element name="either" type="xs:string"/>
>                 <xs:element name="or" macOccurs="unbounded" type="xs:string"/>
>             </xs:sequence>
>             <xs:element name="omittable" type="xs:string"/>
>         </xs:choice>
>     </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> 
> THE GOAL:
> In my online dictionary, I would like to show this same equivalent like this:
> 
> 1. last Sunday evening I was at home
> 2. last Sunday night I was at home
> 3. last Monday evening I was at home
> 4. last Monday night I was at home
> 5. last Tuesday evening I was at home
> 6. last Tuesday night I was at home
> 7. Sunday evening I was at home
> 8. Sunday night I was at home
> 9. Monday evening I was at home
> 10. Monday night I was at home
> 11. Tuesday evening I was at home
> 12. Tuesday night I was at home
> 
> The resulting underlying xml should thus look like this:
> <equivalent>last Sunday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>last Sunday night I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>last Monday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>last Monday night I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>last Tuesday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>last Tuesday night I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Sunday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Sunday night I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Monday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Monday night I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Tuesday evening I was at home</equivalent>
> <equivalent>Tuesday night I was at home</equivalent>
> 
> Can anyone help me through function-calls and recursions? I am using XSLT 2.0.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marie
> 
> PS The example was chosen for it's structural clarity only -
> definitely not as an example of lexicographical best-practices
> 
> **********
> Marie Bilde Rasmussen
> Content architect, MA, BSc
> Gyldendal Publishers
> Copenhagen, Denmark
> 
> marie_bilde@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> mariebilderas@xxxxxxxxx

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2011 All Rights Reserved.