|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: workaround for XSLT 1.0 result tree fragment usage
Don,
In addition to using an extension function to cast the result tree fragment into a node set, another solution is also sometimes possible, since while RTFs can't be interrogated as node-sets, they can be processed as strings. So if you built your variable like this: <active>true</active> <active>true</active> <active>false</active> you could simply test "not(contains($confirm_active_program,'true'))" and that would work. Of course this doesn't scale to more complex situations, but it's good enough for many simple ones. Cheers, Wendell At 09:53 AM 12/19/2007, you wrote: I know the real answer to my question is to move to XSLT 2.0, but for the sake of workplace harmony I'm making other efforts as well. ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








