|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Matching namespaces - one works, one doesn't ?
> I feel namespaces are unjustly given a bad rap and that they > play a critically-important role in information design. Yes, they play a critically-important role, but no, the bad rap is not unjustified. Namespaces are a pig for all sorts of reasons: * they mean that a lexical fragment of XML can't be understood in isolation from its context * the system can't tell which namespaces in an XML document need to be there and which are noise * it's never clear to what extent the choice of namespace prefix is significant * namespaces sometimes look like attributes and sometimes they don't * the common use of "http" to name things that have nothing to do with HTTP confuses the uninitiated * there's no versioning story And perhaps most important of all: * they make most XML specifications and software three times more complicated than they need to be So it's not surprising when some people decide not to use them. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|







