[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi Brad, well, though I am not Brad, I did also answer your question, and like Brad's, it looks at the first non-empty preceding sibling. Which is what you seem to want. But get rid of the for-each and the problem will look a lot easier to swallow. -- Abel Braaksma
|

Cart



